© 2024 St. Louis Public Radio
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Supreme Court Rules Missouri’s Lethal Injection Method Of Execution Is Not ‘Cruel And Unusual’

Russell Bucklew, 50, is on death row for murdering Michael Sanders in Cape Girardeau County.
Missouri Department of Corrections
Russell Bucklew, 50, is on death row for murdering Michael Sanders in Cape Girardeau County.

A narrowly divided U.S. Supreme Court rejected a Missouri death row inmate’s challenge to the state’s single-drug lethal injection method, finding Monday it does not amount to “cruel and unusual” punishment.

In a 5-4 vote, the court’s conservative justices ruled that Russell Bucklew could be put to death by lethal injection using the drug pentobarbital– even though Bucklew claimed it would cause him severe pain because of a rare medical condition.

The decision, written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, found the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment does not guarantee a prisoner a painless death. Gorsuch also found that Bucklew had failed to meet the standard set out in two previous Supreme Court decisions prohibiting as cruel only methods that “superadd terror, pain or disgrace" to a prisoner’s death sentence.

Russell Bucklew, 50, is on death row for murdering Michael Sanders in Cape Girardeau County.
Credit Missouri Department of Corrections
Russell Bucklew, 50, is on death row for murdering Michael Sanders in Cape Girardeau County.

In order to do that, Gorsuch wrote, the prisoner must not only show that the execution method gives rise to a “demonstrated risk of severe pain.” He must also identify “known and available” alternative methods of execution that “significantly reduc[e] a substantial risk of severe pain.”

Bucklew’s Kansas City attorney, Cheryl Pilate,wasn’t immediately available for comment due to a talk she was giving in Topeka.

Karen Pojmann, a spokeswoman for the Missouri Department of Corrections, said Bucklew's execution has not been rescheduled.  

“As far as I know, no further action has been taken,” she said in an email. “No executions are currently scheduled in Missouri.”

Cassandra Stubbs, director of the ACLU Capital Punishment Project, termed the court's decision “a mockery of the constitutional bar against cruel and unusual punishment and our values.” 

“As a result of his unique medical condition, Mr. Bucklew is likely to choke on his own blood during the execution and experience an excruciatingly painful death. This amounts to torture. Permitting such an execution does not reflect on the crimes of Mr. Bucklew, but rather degrades the kind of country we are and aspire to be,” Stubbs said in a statement.

The last execution in Missouri took place in January 2017,  when Mark Christeson was given a lethal injection for the 1998 murders in south-central Missouri of Susan Brouk, her 12-year-old daughter, Adrian, and her 9-year-old son, Kyle.  

Since 1976, when the Supreme Court reaffirmed its acceptance of the use of the death penalty, 1,493 people have been executed in the United States, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. In Missouri, 88 people have been executed since then.

Justice Stephen Breyer wrote the dissent and was joined by the court's three other liberal justices. They said they would have upheld Bucklew’s claims because he had raised a genuine issue as to whether executing him by lethal injection would cause him excessive suffering.

“Bucklew has provided evidence of a serious risk that his execution will be excruciating and grotesque,” Breyer wrote. “The majority holds that the State may execute him anyway.”

The dissenters also disagreed that Supreme Court precedents required Bucklew to identify known and available alternative methods of execution. And even if he was required to do that, they said, he met that burden by proposing the use of nitrogen hypoxia.

Three other states – Alabama, Mississippi and Oklahoma – have authorized the use of nitrogen hypoxia, Breyer noted. A study by Oklahoma found that it was the most humane method of execution, and another study by Louisiana found it could assure a quick and painless death.  

“How then can the majority conclude that Bucklew has failed to identify an alternative method of execution?” Breyer asked.

Bucklew, 50, was sentenced to death for the murder of Michael Sanders in Cape Girardeau County. In March 1996, he entered a trailer where Sanders lived with Bucklew’s ex-girlfriend, Stephanie Ray. Bucklew shot Sanders, tried to shoot a fleeing child, then abducted and raped Ray. He later wounded a state trooper in a shootout before he was captured.

Bucklew has a rare congenital condition, cavernous hemangioma, which he says has caused blood-filled tumors to grow in his head, neck and throat. He contends he’s at risk of gagging and suffocating if he’s executed via lethal injection.   

A year ago, the Supreme Court temporarily halted Bucklew’s execution, with Justice Anthony Kennedy joining the court’s liberals in granting the stay. Kennedy retired from the court three months later.

This story was updated to include the comments of the director of the ACLU Capital Punishment Project.

Dan Margolies is a senior reporter and editor at KCUR. You can reach him on Twitter @DanMargolies .

Copyright 2020 KCUR 89.3. To see more, visit .

Dan was born in Brooklyn, N.Y. and moved to Kansas City with his family when he was eight years old. He majored in philosophy at Washington University in St. Louis and holds law and journalism degrees from Boston University. He has been an avid public radio listener for as long as he can remember – which these days isn’t very long… Dan has been a two-time finalist in The Gerald Loeb Awards for Distinguished Business and Financial Journalism, and has won multiple regional awards for his legal and health care coverage. Dan doesn't have any hobbies as such, but devours one to three books a week, assiduously works The New York Times Crossword puzzle Thursdays through Sundays and, for physical exercise, tries to get in a couple of rounds of racquetball per week.